ArticleJCO precision oncology2026
Integrating Somatic and Germline Pharmacogenomics for Therapeutic Decisions in Precision Oncology.
Article in JCO precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeClinical genomic profiling of tumors identifies therapeutic targets, while germline pharmacogenomics (PGx) guides drug dosing and toxicity avoidance. However, the combined clinical landscape of both somatic and germline actionable variants across cancers has not been comprehensively defined.
methodsTumor and matched germline whole-exome sequencing data were analyzed for 10,302 patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas. Somatic mutations with therapeutic relevance were mapped to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved targeted drugs using the Oncology Knowledge Base database (levels 1-4). Germline PGx variants were identified using PyPGx and cross-referenced with drug-gene interactions in PharmGKB (levels of clinical annotation 1-2). This enabled construction of an integrated germline-somatic PGx profile per patient.
resultsAll 10,302 patients (100%) harbored at least one actionable germline PGx variant (median = 3; range = 1-9), including 7,520 (73%) with variants relevant to chemotherapy toxicity or supportive care medications (
conclusionIntegrating germline PGx with somatic profiling reveals that actionable germline variants are nearly universal among patients with cancer in our cohort, extending beyond tumor-specific therapy to encompass toxicity and supportive care management. Routine implementation of combined germline and somatic sequencing in oncology could enhance therapeutic precision, minimize adverse effects, and inform individualized treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.