Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42090550›Full record

Trial reportCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Addressing Cervical Cancer Screening Disparities: At-Home Self-Collection Among LGBQ+ Populations.

Colleen McNicholas, Lisa Memmel, Clair Kaplan, Youri Hwang, LaShonda Crane, Ronald Orso, Kimberly Harshberger, R Lamar Parker, Ann Collins, Christine Conageski and 10 more

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Colleen McNicholasPlanned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky, Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Louis, MO, US.
Lisa MemmelPlanned Parenthood Northern California, Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Francisco, CA, US.
Clair KaplanPlanned Parenthood of Southern New England, Clinical Research, Hartford, CT, US.
Youri HwangPlanned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, Clinical Research, Boston, MA, US.ORCID 0000-0003-3943-5071
LaShonda CranePlanned Parenthood Gulf Coast, Inc, Clinical Research, Houston, TX, US.
Ronald OrsoAlabama Clinical Therapeutics/Birmingham OBGYN, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Birmingham, AL, US.
Kimberly HarshbergerPlanned Parenthood of Arizona, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Phoenix, AZ, US.
R Lamar ParkerUnified Women's Clinical Research, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Raleigh, NC, US.
Ann CollinsUnified Women's Clinical Research, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Raleigh, NC, US.
Christine ConageskiUniversity of Colorado, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aurora, CO, US.ORCID 0000-0002-3005-3758
Sangini ShethYale School of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hartford, CT, US.
Lindsay KurokiWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Louis, MO, US.ORCID 0000-0002-2141-7310
Jenell ColemanJohns Hopkins University, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baltimore, MD, US.ORCID 0000-0002-7546-7727
Elizabeth SuttonWoman's Hospital, Clinical Research, Baton Rouge, LA, US.ORCID 0000-0002-8807-6434
Ashley JenningsUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Madison, WI, US.
Emeline AvikiNYU Langone Health, Gynecologic Oncology, Mineola, NY, US.ORCID 0000-0003-0891-9399
Megan FitzpatrickTeal Health, Inc., Research, San Francisco, CA, US.ORCID 0000-0001-7040-8018
Karl HiblerIndependent Statistician, Statistician, Bradenton, FL, US.
Alexandra RipkinTeal Health, Inc., Research, San Francisco, CA, US.ORCID 0009-0005-9303-6081
Meghna MukherjeeTeal Health, Inc., Research, San Francisco, CA, US.ORCID 0000-0003-4227-685X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundOver 20 million people in the U.S. are behind on cervical cancer screenings (CCS). Sexual minority populations are 50% less likely to engage in routine screening, putting them at higher risk for cervical dysplasia and cancer due to undetected precancer and delayed diagnosis. Their barriers to speculum exams include access to care, sexual trauma, and provider bias. At-home HPV self-collection (SC) offers a clinically accurate, preferred alternative screening method.ObjectiveTo assess clinical agreement, usability, and screening experiences and preferences for an FDA-authorized at-home vaginal SC device among participants who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, pansexual, queer, or other non-heterosexual identities (LGBQ+).MethodsSELF-CERV was a prospective, multi-site method-comparison study conducted across 16 U.S. sites. Participants completed SC in a simulated at-home setting and underwent clinician collection with a speculum and cervical brush; paired specimens were tested for primary HPV using the Roche cobas. Surveys assessed barriers to screening, prior screening experiences, usability, and preferences. 609 participants were enrolled; 599 had paired samples, including 74 LGBQ+ participants.ResultsCompared with heterosexual participants, LGBQ+ participants more frequently delayed or avoided screening, had lower preventive care engagement, and described worse prior speculum-based screening experiences, including higher pain, discomfort, and aversion. Clinical agreement between self- and clinician-collected specimens was comparable, with no unanticipated safety concerns. The SC device was rated as easy to use and acceptable across groups; LGBQ+ participants reported greater comfort and empowerment and a stronger preference for at-home self-collection. Qualitative comments emphasized privacy and reduced distress, including trauma- and dysphoria-related concerns.ConclusionAt-home SC is a clinically valid, usable, and strongly preferred CCS option, particularly among LGBQ+ populations who experience disproportionate barriers to speculum-based CCS. Broader adoption of FDA-authorized at-home SC paired with telehealth will enable future impact assessment to reduce persistent disparities in CCS for LGBQ+ populations.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPapillomavirus InfectionsSexual and Gender MinoritiesSpecimen HandlingUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHuman Papillomavirus VirusesHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSelf CareUnited Statescervical cancer screeningHPV primary screeningHPV self-collectionsexual minority healthtelehealthtrauma-informed care

Identifiers

PMID42090550
PMCPMC13161634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.