ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2026
Time and amount attributes exert distinct neural influences on gain and loss evaluation.
Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
People typically discount delayed gains more than delayed losses, reflecting a gain-loss asymmetry. This event-related potential study examined how neural representations of amount and time, two prominent attributes in delay discounting, are influenced by contextual valence (gains vs. losses) through the lens of neural dynamics. Forty participants performed a simple guessing task in which they experienced a gain context with varying reward amounts delivered at different time delays, and a loss context with varying loss amounts delivered similarly. Time and amount attributes were manipulated orthogonally and parametrically. Results showed that in the gain context, time attribute was first tracked during the reward positivity period, then integrated with linearly increasing monetary value during the P3 period, and finally processed independently from monetary value during the late positive potential period. In the loss context, time was similarly processed during the RewP period, whereas monetary value was not tracked until the late positive potential period. Additionally, a correlation between behavioral and neural delay discounting was found in the loss but not gain context. Our findings demonstrate distinct evaluative processes for time and amount attributes between gain and loss contexts, providing new insights into the gain-loss asymmetry in delay discounting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.