ArticlePLoS genetics2026
Tissue-specific transfer learning improves functional variant and therapeutic target discoveries in breast and prostate cancer.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA foundation models trained on large-scale genomic and epigenetic datasets have shown promise for regulatory variant interpretation, yet their application to tissue-specific contexts remain limited. Here, we present a transfer learning (TL) framework to adapt Enformer, a deep neural network trained on 5,313 multi-omics tracks, to breast and prostate cancer using 275 and 357 tissue-specific transcription factor (TF) ChIP-seq tracks, respectively. We computed tissue-specific cis-regulatory activity (tCRA) scores for millions of single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in genome-wide association study (GWAS) datasets and prioritized high-impact SNV subsets (1M, 1.5M, and 2M). These TL-prioritized variants demonstrated consistently greater enrichment in tissue-specific enhancers, cancer GWAS risk variants, and ClinVar pathogenic variants compared to the original Enformer model. Transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) using TL-based SNVs identified more cancer-relevant genes, many of which exhibited functional essentiality (DepMap), therapeutic tractability (drug databases), and disease relevance (DisGeNET). Notably, TL models outperformed the base model in identifying genes enriched for drug targets and clinically relevant disease associations. Our results show that TL-derived tCRA scores enhance regulatory variant prioritization and improve susceptibility gene discovery in a tissue-specific manner. Our study provides a generalizable framework for tailoring foundation models to disease-relevant contexts, with implications for variant interpretation, therapeutic target discovery, and precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.