ArticlePloS one2026
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sex-related disparities in cystic fibrosis healthcare utilization and outcomes: A population study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare utilization and access for many, with persons living with pre-existing pulmonary conditions like cystic fibrosis (pwCF) having been the most impacted. PwCF appeared to have improvements in lung function and reduction in pulmonary exacerbations during the pandemic. However, it is not clear if general healthcare utilization beyond CF centers were also reduced and whether there existed any sex-based differences in health outcomes during the pandemic. Our objective was to use population-level administrative data to gain a comprehensive understanding of healthcare utilization and outcomes for pwCF pre- compared to post-COVID.
methodsA retrospective provincial-level analysis was conducted using linked administrative datasets from a single-payer health jurisdiction in Alberta, Canada. We measured hospitalization, emergency department and outpatient visits in pwCF 18 months before and after March 12, 2020. Subgroup analysis was undertaken to differences between sexes.
resultsAcute care encounters (including general emergency department [ED] visits and hospitalizations) for pwCF declined during the pandemic. There was a trend towards an increase in outpatient primary care and specialist clinics (both virtual and in-person) in the post-COVID period. Mortality rate was largely unchanged during the pandemic. CF females and males experienced the same relative change in healthcare utilization during the pandemic with a greater reduction in ED visits by CF females.
conclusionPwCF accessed acute care resources less but females experienced a greater drop in ED visits despite similar hospitalization rates as males, raising the possibility that females with CF experienced a disproportionate barrier to accessing acute care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.