ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Assessing the approach to perinatal mental health screening and treatment in maternal-child health clinics in Western Kenya.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Integrating mental health care into well-attended health services, such as maternal-child health (MCH), offers a promising approach to increasing access to mental health care. To inform integration, we assessed the current approach to screening and treatment of perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMAD) in MCH facilities in Western Kenya. We conducted a cross-sectional survey among the facility managers ("in-charges") at 20 MCH facilities in Western Kenya. Trained data collectors administered questionnaires to assess facility infrastructure and human resources, perinatal mental health screening, psychological interventions, psychiatric medication availability, and level of perinatal mental health integration into standard MCH services. Across 20 MCH facilities, the majority were located in rural areas (16,80%), 2 peri-urban (10%), and 2 urban (10%). Facilities had a median of 37.5 medical staff (IQR: 31.0, 45.5); the most common cadre was nurses (median: 9.0, IQR: 6.0, 12.5). Under half of the facilities (8, 40%) screened for PMAD using a validated tool and documented results; most (19, 95%) reported diagnosing PMAD (not necessarily through a systematic approach), yet only half (10, 53%) documented the diagnosis. The most common psychotherapy reported across the sites was supportive counseling (15, 75%). Some facilities offered evidence-based psychotherapies (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy, problem-solving therapy, etc.), but did not report on training, supervision or guidance from the evidence-based intervention manual. Across all facilities, the availability of mental health medications was limited. Only (12, 60%) had any antidepressant available, (16, 80%) had antiepileptics, (9, 45%) had antipsychotics, and (2, 10%) had mood stabilizers available. Mental health services in MCH clinics in Western Kenya are currently not offered in a structured and systematic manner to effectively alleviate PMAD. Available infrastructure and human resources offer an opportunity to integrate an evidence-based treatment model to improve perinatal mental health in the MCH clinics in Western Kenya.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.