ArticlePloS one2026
Predicting corporate management performance using AI: Incorporating CEO strategy insights from sustainable management reports.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study proposes an AI-based model to predict corporate management performance by combining financial data with strategic information extracted from CEO messages in sustainability reports. Using a dataset of 1,271 listed companies on Korea's KOSPI and KOSDAQ markets (2016-2023), we applied eight machine learning and deep learning classifiers: KNN, SVM, GBM, CatBoost, GAN, RNN, LSTM, and Transformer. Financial variables were selected based on prior accounting research, while strategic variables were derived via text mining of CEO messages and categorized using the Sustainable Balanced Scorecard (SBSC) framework. Results show that models incorporating both financial and strategy-based variables outperformed those using financial data alone. Notably, the Transformer model achieved the highest predictive accuracy, followed by LSTM and RNN. These findings provide actionable insights for investors and corporate stakeholders while advancing interdisciplinary research between accounting and AI. Under 5-fold cross-validation, the best-performing hybrid model (Transformer with SBSC features) achieved Accuracy = 0.8467, AUC = 0.8481, and F1 = 0.8572, and adding SBSC strategy indicators improved mean performance across models (ΔAccuracy=+0.0121; ΔAUC=+0.0092; ΔF1=+0.0119).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.