ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Measuring health financing vulnerability due to reductions in official development assistance: A conceptual framework with empirical application across 47 African countries.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite a 33% increase in Official Development Assistance (ODA) from 2019 to 2023, aid declined by 7% in 2024 and projected to further decline in 2025-2027. Health systems in Africa are being impacted by the sudden aid freezes and cuts. There are no multicriteria metrics to estimate the vulnerability of countries to facilitate dialogue and decisions. This paper proposes an approach to assess country's vulnerability to external aid cuts, considering dynamic health financing and macro-fiscal risk factors. We proposed a framework using four proxy health financing and macro-fiscal factors. Using a polychoric principal component analysis to derive the weight of contribution of each variable, we parameterized the framework with data from existing databases. We applied the framework to assess the health financing vulnerability to external aid cuts/freezes across different countries and explored its validity. Health expenditure per capita in the WHO African Region averaged US$125.2 of which almost 24% depended on external funding. Almost 70% of countries face potential stagnation or contraction in public spending, while 49% of the countries are in debt distress or at high risk of debt distress. The interplay among these factors resulted in the vulnerability of countries averaging almost 60% (range: 23 - 92%), with 27 countries facing "very highly" or "highly" vulnerable health financing situations. Health financing vulnerability explained 31.4% of the variation in UHC attainments and 32.8% of the variation in the number of people pushed further into poverty. We conclude that low spending on health, high donor dependence and unfavourable macro-fiscal conditions, including debt crisis is driving heightened vulnerability across Africa. Countries need to protect essential health services by prioritizing the most vulnerable populations, protect their health budgets through increasing efficiency, generating new revenue through taxes, aligning external aid with national plans and priorities, and better pooling health spending.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.