ArticlePloS one2026
Effect of hysterectomy on the risk of ovarian cancer: A South Korean national cohort study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHysterectomy is a common gynecological surgery, but its long-term impact on ovarian cancer risk remains unclear, particularly in Asian populations.
objectiveTo evaluate the association between hysterectomy (with or without concomitant adnexal surgery) and the risk of ovarian cancer in South Korean women.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database (2002-2020). After 1:1 propensity score matching, 13,059 women who underwent hysterectomy for benign indications (aged 40-59) were compared with 13,059 women without hysterectomy. The primary outcome was incident ovarian cancer, defined by three or more medical visits with a C56.xx diagnosis code. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for ovarian cancer, adjusting for demographic and clinical confounders.
resultsOver a median follow-up of 11.5 years, ovarian cancer incidence was 18 per 100,000 person-years in the hysterectomy group and 13 per 100,000 person-years in the non-hysterectomy group. Hysterectomy was associated with an imprecise estimate of ovarian cancer risk (HR 1.42, 95% CI 0.79-2.56), compatible with both a clinically meaningful decrease and increase in risk; therefore, the findings are inconclusive. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups across various decades of life, including females below or above 50 years of age.
conclusionsThis study found no statistically significant association between hysterectomy and ovarian cancer risk, but the wide confidence intervals and limited number of events indicate that the findings remain inconclusive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.