ArticlePloS one2026
Marrying for power: Gendered alliances in mafias.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drawing on judicial records documenting 770 inter-clan alliances through 906 marriages among 623 'Ndrangheta clans, we analyze how matrimonial ties relate to power and cohesion within the organization. Powerful clans occupy central positions in the marriage network, while alliances among less influential clans function as critical "load-bearing" ties-whose simulated removal fragments the network most rapidly. Contrary to a "bride-receiving" narrative, we do not find clear evidence that status alone determines gendered exchange patterns; powerful clans' higher share of incoming brides (0.559 versus 0.437) is not statistically significant. Instead, an inverted-U relationship emerges: clans with moderately high bride-receiving shares (≈55-60%) exhibit the highest centrality, whereas extreme senders or receivers are structurally peripheral. These findings are consistent with marriage operating as an organizational technology-where powerful families build overlapping ties to enhance resilience, and moderate gender asymmetries optimize both lineage consolidation and network brokerage. Overall, the 'Ndrangheta's durability appears to depend as much on peripheral-to-peripheral alliances as on unions of powerful families, underscoring marriage's dual role in maintaining cohesion and managing power.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.