Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42090397›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Marrying for power: Gendered alliances in mafias.

Maurizio Catino, Alberto Aziani, Sara Rocchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maurizio CatinoDepartment of Sociology and Social Research, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Alberto AzianiDepartment of Sociology and Social Research, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4745-7337
Sara RocchiDepartment of Sociology and Social Research, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drawing on judicial records documenting 770 inter-clan alliances through 906 marriages among 623 'Ndrangheta clans, we analyze how matrimonial ties relate to power and cohesion within the organization. Powerful clans occupy central positions in the marriage network, while alliances among less influential clans function as critical "load-bearing" ties-whose simulated removal fragments the network most rapidly. Contrary to a "bride-receiving" narrative, we do not find clear evidence that status alone determines gendered exchange patterns; powerful clans' higher share of incoming brides (0.559 versus 0.437) is not statistically significant. Instead, an inverted-U relationship emerges: clans with moderately high bride-receiving shares (≈55-60%) exhibit the highest centrality, whereas extreme senders or receivers are structurally peripheral. These findings are consistent with marriage operating as an organizational technology-where powerful families build overlapping ties to enhance resilience, and moderate gender asymmetries optimize both lineage consolidation and network brokerage. Overall, the 'Ndrangheta's durability appears to depend as much on peripheral-to-peripheral alliances as on unions of powerful families, underscoring marriage's dual role in maintaining cohesion and managing power.

Identifiers

PMID42090397
PMCPMC13148698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.