ArticlePloS one2026
Nasal steroids, irrigation, oral antibiotics, and subgroup targeting for effective management of acute sinusitis (NOSES): Protocol for a comparative effectiveness randomized controlled trial.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcute rhinosinusitis (ARS) affects approximately 15% of adults annually. It accounts for nearly 30 million outpatient visits and one in five antibiotic prescriptions, and contributes to over $11 billion in direct healthcare costs in the United States. Because routine clinical evaluation cannot reliably distinguish viral from bacterial ARS, antibiotics are frequently prescribed for infections that are likely viral. Non-antibiotic therapies such as intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) and saline nasal irrigation may provide symptom relief, but their comparative effectiveness in ARS has not been rigorously evaluated.
objectivesThis protocol describes the design and methodology of a large, multi-center, pragmatic randomized controlled trial to evaluate antibiotic and non-antibiotic treatment strategies for ARS. The trial will compare supportive care, and clinical and laboratory indicators that may identify subgroups most likely to benefit from specific therapies.
methodsThis placebo-controlled trial is underway in primary care and urgent care settings in six regions across the U.S. Adults aged 18-75 years with ARS initially receive clinician-directed care. Participants who do not improve after 9 days of symptoms will be randomized into one of four groups: antibiotics alone; placebo-antibiotics plus INCS; antibiotics plus INCS; or placebo-antibiotics alone. All participants receive educational materials and kits for saline nasal irrigation. The trial will enroll 3,720 participants, with approximately 60% expected to enter the randomized phase. Primary outcomes include symptom severity prior to and 3 days post-randomization, as measured by the modified Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-16). SIGNIFICANCE: This trial will generate high-quality evidence to inform targeted treatment of ARS, identify subgroups most likely to benefit from antibiotics or non-antibiotic therapies, and support more judicious antibiotic stewardship in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.