ArticlePloS one2026
Microbial and small zooplankton communities predict density of baleen whales in the southern California Current Ecosystem.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the distribution and abundance of marine mammals is important for assessing population dynamics and evaluating the impacts of human activities on these species. Here, we assessed the capability of microbial and small plankton communities to predict the density of Balaenopteridae whales in the Southern California Current Ecosystem in each season from 2014 to 2020 using data from the California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations (CalCOFI). Densities of Balaenopteridae whales were estimated from visual line transect surveys for three target species - blue (Balaenoptera musculus), fin (Balaenoptera physalus), and humpback (Megaptera novaeangliae) whales - and microbial and small plankton communities were examined in concurrent water samples via metabarcoding of the 16S and 18S rRNA genes. Planktonic communities specific to each target whale species appeared as strong statistical predictors of whale estimated density, explaining 81-99% of variability and predicting density estimates to within ~1 individual per 1000 km2. Our approach improved out-of-sample root mean square prediction error by up to 65% compared with simple alternative methods. Specific planktonic communities observed indicate that some predictor taxa may be ecologically associated with whales as parasites, as skin and respiratory microbiome species, or through the food chain of whale prey. However, further studies are needed to understand how these organisms function collectively as a community and interact with the "ecological habitat" that supports whales. Our results suggest that using planktonic communities to quantify the potential ecological habitat of larger organisms, like baleen whales, can enhance predictive models and may inform hypotheses about the ecological relationships between whales and the biological communities with which they co-occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.