Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42090361›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Is all greenspace created equal? Assessing the relationship of public parks and greenness on academic achievement in Washington state.

Lea Fortmann, Isha Rajbhandari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lea FortmannDepartment of Economics, University of Puget Sound, Tacoma, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2018-3377
Isha RajbhandariDepartment of Economics, University of Puget Sound, Tacoma, Washington, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In educational environments, proximity to greenspace can increase concentration, attentiveness, self-discipline, improve classroom engagement, and support cognitive development. This study contributes to this growing literature by examining the potential benefits associated with public parks on academic performance across different grade levels in four counties in western Washington state, USA. We use a five-year panel data set to assess the impact of a school's proximity to a public park on the percentage of students in each grade who meet or exceed proficiency standards for statewide assessment tests while controlling for general greenness, along with a number of socioeconomic and demographic factors. Our results suggest that having a public park within 800 meters of the school is associated with an increase in the percentage of students that meet or exceed the standard for language arts and math standardized tests for middle schoolers. The local greenness of the school grounds and surrounding area, measured by NDVI, had no impact on test scores. This suggests that the parks themselves could have a positive relationship, beyond increased exposure to greenness, and potentially provide academic benefits to students. We do not find a significant impact of a school's proximity to public parks for elementary or high school students, which we hypothesize could be for various reasons. Though the literature on the benefits associated with public parks is well established, this is the first study, to our knowledge, to investigate their potential relationship with educational performance.

Indexed as

Academic SuccessParks, RecreationalChildFemaleHumansSchoolsStudentsWashington

Identifiers

PMID42090361
PMCPMC13148709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.