ArticlePloS one2026
Ancient East Asian dog lineage is revealed by genome of ancient Korean dogs.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dogs form a monophyletic clade comprising three major sublineages: Eastern Eurasian, Western Eurasian, and sled dog lineages. While ancient genomic studies have clarified relationships within the latter two, the internal structure of the Eastern Eurasian lineage remains unclear. The dingo and New Guinea Singing Dog (NGSD) are regarded as its least admixed members, but it is uncertain whether they were the sole representatives in East Eurasia. Here, we sequenced ancient genomes from three dogs excavated at the Neuk-do site (3rd century BCE-early 1st century CE) in Sacheon and one dog from the Bonghwang-dong site (4th-6th century CE) in Gimhae. Average genomic coverages for the Neuk-do dogs were 0.5 × , 0.73 × , and 0.64 × , and 0.3× for the Bonghwang-dong dog. Phylogenetic analyses, outgroup-f₃ statistics, and principal component analysis (PCA) of dogs and wolves showed that ancient Korean dogs were closely related to the dingo and NGSD. However, dog-only PCA separated ancient Korean dogs from dingo/NGSD, indicating a distinct lineage within Eastern Eurasia. The detection of Western Eurasian ancestry in the Neuk-do dogs demonstrates that admixture had begun before the 3rd century BCE. The higher proportion of this ancestry in the Bonghwang-dong dog suggests that additional admixture occurred by the 4th to 6th centuries CE. These findings reveal that ancient Korean dogs represent a separate Eastern Eurasian lineage that had already experienced Western Eurasian gene flow by the late first millennium BCE, providing new insights into the evolutionary history of dogs in Eastern Eurasia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.