Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42090152›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Physician Intent to Reduce Hours and Intent to Leave Organizations.

Lisa Rotenstein, Purva Shah, Roger Brown, Heather Farley, Tait Shanafelt, Christine A Sinsky

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lisa RotensteinDivision of Clinical Informatics, University of California at San Francisco.
Purva ShahDivision of Professional Satisfaction and Practice Sustainability, American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois.
Roger BrownSchool of Nursing, Research Design and Statistics Unit, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Heather FarleyDivision of Professional Satisfaction and Practice Sustainability, American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois.
Tait ShanafeltDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Christine A SinskyDivision of Professional Satisfaction and Practice Sustainability, American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a substantial prevalence of physicians intending to reduce their clinical hours (ITR) or intending to leave their current organization (ITL). It is unclear how work intentions have changed since that time. Objective: To characterize how the prevalence of ITR and ITL changed among physicians since the COVID-19 pandemic, factors associated with ITR and ITL, and factors associated with physicians' decision to remain at their current clinical workload or their current organization. Design, Setting, and Participants: This serial cross-sectional study was conducted from January 7, 2022, to November 3, 2024, among 160 organizations across the US with 100 or more physicians across specialties. Physicians responded to the American Medical Association's Organizational Biopsy study in 2022, 2023, or 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes were ITR within the next 12 months and ITL within the next 24 months. Results: The sample consisted of 37 112 physicians (7176 physicians in 2022, 12 248 in 2023, and 17 688 in 2024; median organizational response rate of 41.5% [IQR, 29%-60%]; 18 626 of 35 202 male physicians [52.9%]) from 160 organizations, including 81.4% physicians (25 381 of 31 182) who identified as practicing clinically full-time. The overall point prevalence of ITR decreased from 25.6% (1489 of 5815) in 2022 to 22.5% (3266 of 14 540) in 2024 (P = .002), while the prevalence of ITL decreased from 19.9% (1345 of 6760) in 2022 to 15.1% (2414 of 15 935) in 2024 (P = .002). Decreases in ITR and ITL were seen across multiple physician groups. In multivariable-adjusted models, female physicians had higher odds of ITR than male physicians (odds ratio [OR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.20), but lower odds of ITL (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-0.99). Part-time physicians had 1.18 (95% CI, 1.09-1.29) times the odds of ITR and 1.35 (95% CI, 1.25-1.45) times the odds of ITL compared with full-time physicians. The most prevalent factors that would make respondents reconsider ITR or ITL-including a desire for increased workflow efficiency, improved staffing, and enhanced compensation-were common across the 2 outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: This serial, cross-sectional, multisite study of US physicians suggests that while the prevalence of ITR and ITL have decreased since the COVID-19 pandemic, more than one-fifth of physicians continued to report ITR and nearly 1 in 6 reported ITL. In aggregate, compared with historical data, current rates represent mixed progress with favorable overall trends in ITL but unfavorable trends in ITR. Common factors, including greater workflow efficiency and consistent staffing, were reported as potentially mitigating both ITR and ITL. These findings can help leaders prioritize and target interventions to sustain the effort of the physician workforce.

Indexed as

COVID-19IntentionPersonnel TurnoverPhysiciansWorkloadCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2United States

Identifiers

PMID42090152
PMCPMC13150640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.