SynthesisJournal of endocrinological investigation2026
Quality of life in primary aldosteronism, medical vs surgical treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPrimary aldosteronism (PA) can be managed either by unilateral adrenalectomy (ADX) or pharmacologically with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA). Several recent meta-analyses have examined how these treatment modalities affect cardiovascular outcomes in patients with PA. However, the impact of treatment on quality of life (QoL) remains largely unexplored.
objectiveTo synthesize data from previous studies that have investigated QoL in either medically or surgically treated patients with PA.
methodsA literature search was conducted in May 2025 in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. Studies containing data on QoL before and after ADX or MRA were selected.
resultsFifteen studies evaluated QoL after treatment for PA. Most comparative studies reported greater and faster QoL improvement after ADX than with MRA. QoL consistently improved after ADX, whereas results with MRA were variable and less consistent. Patients treated with MRA were older than patients treated with ADX and frequently received low MRA doses. Five studies (259 ADX-treated and 88 MRA-treated patients) were included in a meta-analysis. Baseline QoL did not differ between treatment groups. At 6 months, QoL improved in both groups, with no statistically significant difference between ADX and MRA.
conclusionTreatment of PA is associated with improved QoL following both ADX and MRA therapy. Although several studies suggest superior outcomes after adrenalectomy, the meta-analysis did not show a significant difference at 6 months of follow-up. The limited number of patients, short follow-up duration, and potential undertreatment with MRA represent important limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.