ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2026
Tear Dynamics During Fenestrated Scleral Lens Wear: A Pilot Study.
Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Scleral Lens Fenestrations and Fluid Reservoir Debris.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop a Scheimpflug-based image analysis technique to quantify tear exchange during scleral lens wear and investigate fluid reservoir tear dynamics during fenestrated lens wear.
methodsNine healthy participants wore a scleral lens (KATT™, Capricornia Contact Lenses) with a single 0.3 mm diameter limbal fenestration in one eye for 90 min. Central (0-2.5 mm from the corneal apex) and peripheral (-1.0 to 0 mm from the scleral spur) stromal cornea oedema was measured using optical coherence tomography. Scheimpflug images were obtained during lens wear at multiple time points following the application of sodium fluorescein to the bulbar conjunctiva. These images were exported and annotated manually to select the region of interest (the fluid reservoir) from which the intensity of each pixel was extracted to provide a measure of fluorescent intensity (in arbitrary units [AU] on a scale of 0-255) throughout lens wear across the central 10 mm.
resultsThe coefficient of repeatability for central fluid reservoir intensity measurements was 7 AU (on a scale of 0-255 AU). Fluid reservoir fluorescent intensity varied with measurement location (p < 0.001), being greater towards the periphery (4 and 5 mm from the centre). On average, intensity differences between the peripheral and central fluid reservoir diminished within 10 min of sodium fluorescein application. Two patterns of tear dynamics were observed and were classified as low and high flow. Low flow participants (n = 6) exhibited greater central (3.72× more) and peripheral (2.25× more) corneal oedema, but the difference was not statistically significant.
conclusionsThe ingress and mixing of sodium fluorescein within the fluid reservoir stabilised between central and peripheral locations after 10 min of fenestrated scleral lens wear. Two patterns of tear dynamics were observed (low and high flow), with low flow participants exhibiting greater corneal oedema. Future research utilising the developed technique may provide further insights into tear exchange during scleral lens wear with different fenestration sizes and configurations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.