ArticleInsights into imaging2026
Gender equity in radiology and radiology research: a survey by the European Society of Radiology.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesGender equity in medicine remains a topic of increasing attention. The aim was to investigate if gender influences the radiology profession, with a focus on career progression, leadership roles, work-life balance, research activity and perceived barriers. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn anonymous online survey consisting of 22 questions was distributed by the European Society of Radiology (ESR) to its members between October and December 2024. The survey covered demographics, work schedules, family responsibilities, career development, leadership roles, research involvement, and perceived personal experiences. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square test, and rate differences with confidence intervals. Open-ended responses were explored qualitatively using thematic analysis.
resultsAmong 830 respondents, 657 completed the questionnaire (63.3% female, 35.3% male, 1.3% others). Women more frequently reported caregiving responsibilities beyond childcare (4.1% vs 3%), longer parental leave (46.2% vs 21.5%), and experiences of harassing behaviors at work. Men held a higher proportion of leadership roles (33.2% vs 25.2%). Respondents involved in research were more likely to work > 30% extra hours (47.2% vs 29.0%). Although research activity rates were similar across genders, women more often reported barriers to attending conferences and a lack of protected research time. Career fulfillment increased with age among men but decreased among women. Gender was considered a career disadvantage by 44.5% of women versus 9.5% of men.
conclusionThe survey reveals perceived gender disparities in radiology, particularly in leadership access, work conditions, and career satisfaction. Addressing structural barriers and promoting supportive workplace policies are essential to achieving true gender equity in the field. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Despite improvements in the last few decades, gender inequity remains present in radiology. Variability between geographical regions suggests that key critical areas can be addressed to promote improvement and support a more equitable professional environment. KEY POINTS: Perceived gender disparities in radiology are present across career progression, leadership roles, and work-life balance. Women were significantly more likely than men to perceive gender as a career disadvantage (44.5% vs 9.5%; p < 0.0001 35.0% [95% CI: 28.9 to 41.1]). They reported slightly higher caregiving responsibilities and longer parental leave. Structural inequalities impact gender equity in radiology, requiring targeted institutional and cultural changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.