Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42090087›Full record

ArticleIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2026

Commentary On Tsikandilakis Et Al. (2025)-Subtleties of Awareness Help Explain Discrepancies Between Conscious and Unconscious Perception Interpretations: Implications for Researchers and Their Participants.

Steven J Haase

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Steven J HaaseShippensburg University, Shippensburg, PA, 17202, USA. sjhaas@retiree.ship.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As Tsikandilakis et al. (2025) illustrate, an intense back and forth scientific debate on the existence and scope of unconscious processing has existed for at least 2000 years and within the field of psychology for well over 100 years. The focus of my commentary highlights important contributions from signal detection theory, which my work was based upon, beginning over 30 years ago (Haase, 1994). Much more research has been done in the last 30 years as interest in the topic has grown and achieved a higher degree of respect within psychology and related disciplines. The controversy is obviously not resolved, but ideas are offered for making progress, some of which are emphasized in Tsikandilakis et al. (2025). Other approaches may have merit as well, based on experimental and observational data that acknowledge and emphasize the importance of subjective principles such as weak or fragmentary conscious experiences of masked prime stimuli that continue to "haunt" interpretations of unconscious perception.

Indexed as

AwarenessConsciousnessPerceptionSignal Detection, PsychologicalUnconscious, PsychologyHumansDissociationsObjective and subjective methodsPhenomenal and access consciousnessSignal detection theory

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.