ArticleNeurology and therapy2026
Adherence, Persistence, and Safety of Risdiplam in Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Population-Based Cohort Study.
Article in Neurology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSpinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare neuromuscular disorder caused by biallelic SMN1 variants, partially modulated by SMN2 copy number. Risdiplam, an oral SMN2 splicing modifier, has demonstrated efficacy in SMA. However, long-term adherence and persistence are key to sustaining benefit. We evaluated real-world adherence, persistence, and safety of risdiplam in a population-based cohort.
methodsThis was a retrospective observational study including all genetically confirmed SMA type 1-3 patients treated with risdiplam in Spain between January 2020 and October 2025. Adherence was assessed using the proportion of days covered (PDC) from pharmacy dispensing records and the Morisky-Green questionnaire. Persistence was defined as time to permanent discontinuation or switch. Adverse events (AEs) were extracted from clinical records, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate persistence probabilities.
resultsFifty-three patients were included (38 adults, 15 pediatric patients); 5.7% had SMA type 1, 52.8% type 2, and 41.5% type 3. One pediatric patient with SMA type 1 was presymptomatic at treatment initiation. Median age at risdiplam initiation was 29 years (interquartile range [IQR] 17-42), and 35.8% had prior nusinersen exposure. Adherence was high: median PDC was 100% (IQR 100-100) at 12 months and throughout follow-up; all patients assessed with the Morisky-Green questionnaire (35/53, 66%) were adherent. At 12 months, 92.5% (49/53) remained on treatment (Kaplan-Meier estimate 94.3%; 95% CI 88.3-100.0). Persistence at 24 and 36 months was 87.8% and 80.1%, respectively; later estimates should be interpreted cautiously because of the limited number of patients at risk. Median treatment duration was 28.1 months. Nine patients (17.0%) discontinued treatment. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 4/53 patients (7.5%), including one pediatric case of leukocytoclastic vasculitis requiring permanent discontinuation.
conclusionsIn this real-world population-based cohort, risdiplam showed very high adherence, favorable short- to mid-term persistence, and a favorable safety profile, supporting the feasibility of oral therapy in both pediatric and adult patients with SMA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.