ArticleJournal of gambling studies2026
Development and Validation of the Gambling Impact Scale for Families.
Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop the Gambling Impact Scale (GIS), an instrument designed to assess the multidimensional burden experienced by family members affected by gambling problems, and to examine its validity and reliability. A web-based survey was conducted with two independent samples of affected family members. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on Sample 1 (n = 162) using maximum likelihood estimation and promax rotation to refine an initial item pool. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted on a separate and larger sample (Sample 2, n = 416) to validate the factor structure. The analyses supported a five-factor structure comprising 24 items: Psychological Distress, Economic Damage, Communication Problems and Distrust, Denial and Aggressive Attitudes from the Person with Gambling Problems, and Aggressive Feelings and Attitudes Toward the Person with Gambling Problems. All subscales demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83-0.93). The CFA results indicated an acceptable model fit (CFI = 0.938, RMSEA = 0.079). Construct validity was examined through associations with a codependency scale completed by family members, as well as by comparing GIS scores according to participation in family support groups. Significant group differences were observed, with participants who had engaged in support for one year or longer reporting lower levels of family burden. The scale offers a comprehensive assessment of the emotional, financial, and relational burdens experienced by affected family members. It may serve as a useful tool for identifying support needs and evaluating outcomes of family-based interventions. Future research should examine its responsiveness to changes over time and consider broader applications across different cultural contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42090066What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.