ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2026
Detecting Patterns of Intimate Partner Violence Using Qualitative Analyses and Machine Learning Algorithms.
Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-Enabled First-Response Support After Sexual and Gender-Based Violence: A PRISMA-ScR Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intimate partner violence (IPV) survivors increasingly use social media platforms to share their experiences and to seek help and support for their IPV-related concerns. IPV evidence extracted from social media platforms can provide valuable information and complement data obtained from conventional data sources (e.g., self-reports and interviews) thereby enhancing our understanding of IPV victimization. This study addressed three research questions: (1) What range of IPV behaviors emerge through qualitative coding? (2) To what extent do machine learning (ML) based text classifications yield results comparable to qualitative coding of IPV behaviors? and (3) Do the conceptualizations that emerge from unsupervised ML capture additional behaviors or contextual information not identified through qualitative analyses? We analyzed 400 posts from women on IPV-related online forums using qualitative content analysis and two ML approaches: supervised text classification and unsupervised topic modeling (Latent Dirichlet Allocation). Supervised learning approaches, notably Random Forest and Neural Networks, proved effective in classifying IPV violence subtypes with high accuracy (F1 scores .62 - .85). A comparison of findings from the qualitative and topic modeling approaches supported the presence of distinct characteristics of IPV: physical and sexual violence, psychological/emotional abuse, and coercive control. The ML model revealed vocabulary patterns consistent with relational and child-related contexts, temporal and frequency indicators of violence, references to legal system engagement, and spatial contexts, elements that were less captured through thematic qualitative coding alone. The consistency of findings across qualitative and ML approaches points to the potential of leveraging ML techniques when analyzing qualitative data, thus enabling the development of timely and effective IPV interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.