Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42090002›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2026

Measurement Techniques and Properties of Single-item Measures for the Evaluation of Oropharyngeal Muscle Function in Adults with Dysphagia: A Systematic Review using the COSMIN Framework.

Eileen Kelly, Joelle Hako, Anna Creagh Chapman, Brigitta Fazzini, Timothy J Stephens, Renée Speyer, Anna-Liisa Sutt, Zudin Puthucheary

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eileen KellyCritical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. eileen.kelly3@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3179-4600
Joelle HakoCritical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Anna Creagh ChapmanDepartment of Speech and Language Therapy, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Brigitta FazziniCritical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Timothy J StephensCritical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Renée SpeyerDiscipline of Speech and Language Therapy, School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Anna-Liisa SuttDepartment of Speech and Language Therapy, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Zudin PuthuchearyCritical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Funding

Barts Charity G-002784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscle dysfunction is a critical construct in dysphagia. Despite the availability of diverse techniques to evaluate muscle function, a comprehensive synthesis of measurement items and their properties is lacking. A systematic review of studies examining the measurement techniques used to directly evaluate oropharyngeal muscle function was performed. Studies investigating the use of surface electromyography, tongue dynamometry, ultrasound, high-resolution pharyngeal manometry, magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography and reporting measurement properties in line with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement InstrumeNts (COSMIN) were included. Measurement outcomes derived from these techniques were operationalised as single-item measures. Methodological quality was evaluated using the QualSyst tool. From the 6279 records, 125 eligible studies were identified. The breakdown of techniques was surface electromyography (n = 33), tongue dynamometry (n = 34), ultrasound (n = 17), high-resolution pharyngeal manometry (n = 15), magnetic resonance imaging (n = 5), computed tomography (n = 4) and combined techniques (n = 17). Single-item measures were heterogenous, covering a range of domains including muscle activation, coordination, strength, endurance, composition, thickness, and kinematics. Studies focused predominantly on oral rather than pharyngeal musculature. Validity (n = 117) was widely reported, primarily via known-group validity or hypothesis testing. Fewer studies examined reliability (n = 20) and responsiveness (n = 25); however, where reported, results indicated excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability and responsiveness to therapeutic interventions. A diverse range of single-item measures were identified across included measurement techniques. Measurement properties were sparsely reported. Future research should focus on rigorous measurement instrument design and standardisation to comprehensively evaluate the underlying mechanisms of dysphagia.

Indexed as

DysphagiaMeasurementMuscleSystematic Review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.