Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42089998›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2026

Agents' awareness of visuo-motor incongruency determines changes in haptic sensitivity.

Yanick Kloss, Wilfried Kunde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yanick KlossDepartment of Psychology (III), University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. yanick.kloss@uni-wuerzburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4211-5047
Wilfried KundeDepartment of Psychology (III), University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When body movements are transformed into somewhat discrepant effects in the environment, agents are surprisingly unaware of what their body is doing exactly (e.g., Knoblich and Kircher 2004; Fourneret and Jeannerod 1998; Sutter et al. 2008). Presumably, that is because agents control such movements primarily via their transformed visual effects while downregulating the processing of haptic movement effects (for a review, see Sutter et al. 2013). In two experiments, we measured tactile sensitivity on the moving effector as a proxy for the up- or downregulation of processing haptic effects during continuous visuo-motor congruent or incongruent tool transformations. As expected, tactile sensitivity was modulated by incongruency, but only when individuals became aware of it. Awareness came with an increase in tactile sensitivity, suggesting that haptic processing is upregulated once agents notice that their movements are not congruent with intended visual effects. These findings challenge the presumed dominance of environment-related action consequences in movement control, demonstrating the breakthrough of tactile perception in case of visuo-haptic incongruency.

Indexed as

AwarenessPsychomotor PerformanceTouch PerceptionVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleMovementPhotic StimulationYoung AdultAction controlIdeomotor theoryTactile sensitivityVisuo-motor incongruency

Identifiers

PMID42089998
PMCPMC13149653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.