Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42089985›Full record

ArticleOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

Complementary roles of convolutional neural networks and multimodal large language models (ChatGPT) in radiographic implant identification : A clinical and exploratory study.

Christian Riediger, Mark Ferl, Martin Lohrengel, Sebastian Illiger, Christoph H Lohmann, Maria Schönrogge

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christian RiedigerOrthopaedic University Clinic Magdeburg, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany. christian.riediger@med.ovgu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2336-6684
Mark FerlOrthopaedic University Clinic Magdeburg, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Martin LohrengelOrthopaedic University Clinic Magdeburg, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Sebastian IlligerOrthopaedic University Clinic Magdeburg, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Christoph H LohmannOrthopaedic University Clinic Magdeburg, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2962-2183
Maria SchönroggeOrthopaedic University Clinic Magdeburg, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8904-3637

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate identification of implants in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is essential for revision arthroplasty but is often complicated by incomplete documentation. While convolutional neural networks (CNNs) achieve high accuracy in implant recognition, the role of multimodal large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT remains unclear.

methodsThis study combined a retrospective radiographic analysis of 80 bicompartmental TKA cases with a structured comparison of CNN-based classification and LLM-based interpretive reasoning. The analysis included four implant systems. Convolutional neural networks served as benchmark references, while a multimodal large language model (ChatGPT) was evaluated for implant identification, reasoning, and confidence estimation.

resultsRadiographs in anteroposterior projection showed higher recognition performance than lateral views across all systems. The combined use of both projections improved reliability, indicating dependence on complementary morphological features. Convolutional neural network-based approaches achieved accuracies exceeding 99%. In contrast, the evaluated large language model provided contextual interpretation and implant suggestions but lacked measurable classification accuracy. Confidence levels were moderate (median 0.63-0.70). Interrater agreement was moderate to substantial (κ = 0.52-0.74).

conclusionConvolutional neural network-based algorithms remain the gold standard for implant classification. Multimodal large language models provide complementary strengths in contextual reasoning. Hybrid approaches may improve clinical workflows in revision arthroplasty.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceClinical decision supportOrthopedic imagingRadiographic analysisRevision arthroplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.