ArticleOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
Complementary roles of convolutional neural networks and multimodal large language models (ChatGPT) in radiographic implant identification : A clinical and exploratory study.
Article in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Structured Critical Review and Descriptive Evidence Map of Validation, Uncertainty, and Workflow Integration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate identification of implants in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is essential for revision arthroplasty but is often complicated by incomplete documentation. While convolutional neural networks (CNNs) achieve high accuracy in implant recognition, the role of multimodal large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT remains unclear.
methodsThis study combined a retrospective radiographic analysis of 80 bicompartmental TKA cases with a structured comparison of CNN-based classification and LLM-based interpretive reasoning. The analysis included four implant systems. Convolutional neural networks served as benchmark references, while a multimodal large language model (ChatGPT) was evaluated for implant identification, reasoning, and confidence estimation.
resultsRadiographs in anteroposterior projection showed higher recognition performance than lateral views across all systems. The combined use of both projections improved reliability, indicating dependence on complementary morphological features. Convolutional neural network-based approaches achieved accuracies exceeding 99%. In contrast, the evaluated large language model provided contextual interpretation and implant suggestions but lacked measurable classification accuracy. Confidence levels were moderate (median 0.63-0.70). Interrater agreement was moderate to substantial (κ = 0.52-0.74).
conclusionConvolutional neural network-based algorithms remain the gold standard for implant classification. Multimodal large language models provide complementary strengths in contextual reasoning. Hybrid approaches may improve clinical workflows in revision arthroplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42089985What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.