Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42089980›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026

Is Local Tranexamic Acid Worth Using in Hair Transplantation? An Intrapatient Comparison.

Ümit Akpınar, Mehmet Semih Çelik

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ümit AkpınarPrivate Dermatology Practice, Ankara, Turkey. drumitakpinar@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5816-760X
Mehmet Semih ÇelikGazi Yaşargil Education and Research Hospital, Diyarbakır, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3378-0619

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcessive bleeding during donor area harvesting may impair surgical control and graft quality in hair transplantation. While adrenaline-based tumescent solutions are routinely used, the additional value of local tranexamic acid (TXA) in this setting remains unclear.

objectiveTo evaluate whether local TXA provides additional benefit compared with standard adrenaline-based tumescence during donor area follicular unit excision (FUE).

methodsThis intrapatient-controlled, single-blinded study included 57 male patients undergoing FUE. In each patient, two adjacent 4 cm

resultsBleeding scores were significantly lower in the adrenaline-only control areas compared with TXA-treated areas (median [IQR] 2 [2-3] vs. 3 [2-4]; p < 0.001), with a large effect size (r = 0.56).

conclusionWithin the specific protocol applied in this study, adrenaline-based tumescence demonstrated more effective immediate intraoperative hemostasis. However, given the difference in total adrenaline exposure between groups, the independent contribution of tranexamic acid cannot be conclusively determined. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Antifibrinolytic AgentsBlood Loss, SurgicalHairTissue and Organ HarvestingTranexamic AcidAdultCohort StudiesEpinephrineFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeAntifibrinolytic AgentsEpinephrineTranexamic AcidBleedingHair transplantationHarvestingTranexamic acid

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.