ArticleJACC. Asia2026
Long-Term Survival of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty for Inoperable Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Multicenter Study.
Article in JACC. Asia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBalloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is recommended for inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).
objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term survival benefit of BPA for inoperable CTEPH, especially partial BPA sessions.
methodsIn this multicenter cohort study, 232 patients undergoing BPA (the BPA group) and 70 patients refusing the BPA procedure (the non-BPA group) were enrolled. The BPA group was further divided into the full-BPA group (129 patients) and the partial-BPA group (103 patients). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.
resultsDuring a median follow-up time of 6.0 years (Q1-Q3: 3.7-7.3), 17 and 26 patients in the BPA and non-BPA groups died, contributing to 8-year survival rates of 86.7% (95% CI: 80.1%-93.8%) and 57.8% (95% CI: 45.9%-72.8%) in the BPA and non-BPA groups, respectively (P < 0.001, log-rank test). BPA was associated with significantly reduced all-cause mortality in inoperable CTEPH patients (HR: 0.20; 95% CI: 0.12-0.32; P < 0.001). In secondary analysis, the 8-year survival rates were 97.1% (95% CI: 93.8%-99.9%) and 70.0% (95% CI: 55.8%-87.8%) in the full-BPA and partial-BPA groups, respectively, both better than the non-BPA group (P < 0.001, log-rank test). Compared with the non-BPA group, partial BPA was associated with significantly reduced all-cause mortality in inoperable CTEPH patients (HR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.22-0.70; P = 0.001).
conclusionsBPA tended to be associated with a reduced risk for all-cause mortality in patients with inoperable CTEPH, even those undergoing partial BPA sessions. These findings are preliminary and must be confirmed in randomized controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.