SynthesisWorld journal of surgery2026
Association Between Mesh Placement and Recurrence and Chronic Pain After Incisional Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in World journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecurrence and chronic pain remain significant challenges in incisional hernia repair, and evidence on the optimal mesh placement is limited. This review aimed to determine whether there is a difference in the risk of recurrence and chronic pain based on mesh placement in patients undergoing incisional hernia repair.
methodsStudies with adults undergoing elective incisional hernia repair for defects < 10 cm were included. PubMed, Embase Ovid, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched on August 18, 2025. RCTs were assessed with Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool, version 2. Cohort studies were evaluated with Cochrane's Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions, version 2. Meta-analyses and a network meta-analysis were conducted to compare recurrence rates across placements. The protocol was pre-registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251148033).
resultsTwenty-two studies with 10,832 patients were included. Crude recurrence rates were highest for preperitoneal (12.8%) and lowest for retromuscular (3.0%) mesh positions. In the network meta-analysis, retromuscular (RR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.8) and intraperitoneal (RR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.9) placements were significantly associated with a lower risk of recurrence compared with onlay. However, the certainty of evidence was very low due to high risk of bias and heterogeneity, limiting confidence in these estimates. Four studies reported chronic pain, but substantial heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis.
conclusionRetromuscular mesh placement may reduce recurrence compared with onlay mesh. However, these findings were limited by clinical and statistical heterogeneity across studies. Reports on chronic pain were few and heterogeneous, needing further research on the link between chronic pain and mesh placement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.