Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42089749›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026

Development of a novel multimodal deep learning approach to improve diagnostic precision in ovarian cancer.

Po-Chun Chiu, Chia-Yi Lee, Heng-Cheng Hsu, Yi-Jou Tai, Ying-Cheng Chiang, Tzu-Pin Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Po-Chun ChiuInstitute of Health Data Analytics and Statistics, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, No. 17, Xu-Zhou Road, ZhongZheng District, Taipei City 100025, Taiwan.
Chia-Yi LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, No. 2, Sec. 1, Shengyi Rd., Zhubei City, Hsinchu County 302058, Taiwan.
Heng-Cheng HsuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, No. 7, Chung Shan S. Rd., ZhongZheng Dist., Taipei City 100225, Taiwan.
Yi-Jou TaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, No. 7, Chung Shan S. Rd., ZhongZheng Dist., Taipei City 100225, Taiwan.
Ying-Cheng ChiangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, No. 2, Sec. 1, Shengyi Rd., Zhubei City, Hsinchu County 302058, Taiwan.
Tzu-Pin LuInstitute of Health Data Analytics and Statistics, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, No. 17, Xu-Zhou Road, ZhongZheng District, Taipei City 100025, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3697-0386

Funding

Development Center for Medical DevicesHigher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education in Taiwan NTU-114 L9004Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST-109-2314-B-002-151-MY3National Science Technology Council, Taiwan NSTC-114-2314-B-002-067-MY3National Taiwan University 115KKZA3T,1National Taiwan University GTZ300Population Health Research Center from Featured Areas Research Center Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOvarian cancer represents the primary cause of mortality from gynecological malignancies among women. Treatment strategies for benign versus malignant ovarian tumors differ significantly, making accurate preoperative diagnosis essential for clinical decision-making. Traditional ultrasound diagnosis is highly operator-dependent, introducing subjectivity and variability. To improve diagnostic precision in ovarian tumor classification, we developed a multimodal deep learning system that combines ultrasound images with corresponding clinical text reports.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 1342 ultrasound images from 1062 patients who received surgical treatment for ovarian tumors at National Taiwan University Hospital from 2011 to 2021. Patients were classified into benign (n = 612) and malignant (including borderline, n = 450) groups based on pathology. A multimodal deep learning architecture was developed, incorporating DenseNet-121 and Swin Transformer for image feature extraction and Bio-Clinical BERT for processing clinical text reports. The dataset was split using subject-level stratification with five-fold cross-validation and a 15% independent test set. Furthermore, an external validation cohort of 268 effective cases from 3 independent medical centers was utilized to evaluate the model's generalizability.

resultsThe multimodal model achieved superior performance at the subject level with 81.77% (95% CI: 75.89%, 86.48%) accuracy, 79.59% (95% CI: 70.57%, 86.38%) sensitivity, 83.81% (95% CI: 75.59%, 89.64%) specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.93). In the external validation, the model maintained robust performance with an accuracy of 88.81%, sensitivity of 92.59%, and specificity of 84.96%, outperforming the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Simple Rules (accuracy 86.4%). Integration of clinical text information significantly improved diagnostic performance compared to image-only models. Backward selection analysis revealed that both uterine findings and ovarian tumor descriptions contributed synergistically to the final diagnosis.

conclusionsThis study successfully developed a multimodal deep learning model with diagnostic performance superior to traditional operator-dependent approaches. The model shows promise as a diagnostic tool for ovarian tumor classification, offering clinicians a way to improve preoperative diagnostic accuracy and enhance patient care quality.

Indexed as

Deep LearningOvarian NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTaiwanUltrasonographyartificial intelligence diagnosismultimodal deep learningovarian tumorsultrasound imaging

Identifiers

PMID42089749
PMCPMC13147446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.