Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42089711›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuromuscular diseases2026

Conflicts in Best Interest; Infants with severe neuromuscular disorders presenting to UK Courts.

Anirban Majumdar, Silvia Sanchez Marco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anirban MajumdarDepartment of Paediatric Neurology, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8521-1138
Silvia Sanchez MarcoDepartment of Paediatric Neurology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3261-4480

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infants with severe neuromuscular disorders, presenting a birth, are often unable to move, communicate, breathe, and feed. Unlike infants with severe birth asphyxia and cerebral palsy, these neuromuscular conditions are often associated with presumed normal cognition. Supporting these very severely affected infants and maintaining life through medical intervention or re-orientating care to palliation is often debated, and decision-making can be extremely challenging. Although guidelines exist to help navigate this process (Nuffield Council of Bioethics and Royal Collage of Paediatrics guidelines) deciding what is in the child's best interest is fraught with difficulties. This article explores some of the unique issues that arise in infants with severe neuromuscular conditions and illustrates the challenges in determining best interest for these patients, using some of the cases in the legal literature and the authors personal experience.

Indexed as

best interestcognitionlegalneonatesneuromuscularquality of life

Identifiers

PMID42089711
PMCPMC13438667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.