ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026
Classifying Multistate DNA Origami: An Automated Approach with Minimal Labeling and Confidence-Based Filtering.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA origami nanostructures can adopt multiple conformational states, making an accurate and rapid classification essential for advancing nanoscale fabrication. Although atomic force microscopy (AFM) provides indispensable structural validation, manual per-object labeling for classification is a persistent bottleneck. Here, we introduce an automated classification framework that minimizes user annotation while maintaining high accuracy. The pipeline employs a confidence-based filter to flag uncertain or aggregated objects, which are then selectively relabeled and augmented for iterative retraining. This human-in-the-loop refinement enables the classifier to capture greater intraclass morphological diversity without extensive new labeling. With only 20 labeled images per class expanded through strong augmentation, our framework consistently outperforms established few-shot and contrastive learning baselines on two structurally distinct DNA origami data sets, while also shortening analysis time relative to conventional methods, enabling efficient, high-throughput, and objective classification of multistate DNA nanostructure populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.