ReviewClinical and translational science2026
Clinical Pharmacology and Translational Science Considerations in the Development of Dual-Payload Antibody Drug Conjugates.
Review in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Pharmacology and Translational Science Considerations in the Development of Dual-Payload Antibody Drug Conjugates.Clinical and translational science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have evolved in the last decade or two from carrying a single chemotherapy payload to carrying highly potent tubulin inhibitors and DNA damaging agents. While the latter have shown success in the clinic, efficacy has been constrained by therapeutic resistance, limited tumor penetration, and suboptimal immune activation. Currently, the ADC development space also includes the development of tumor-targeting monoclonal antibodies that carry dual-payloads, incorporating both cytotoxic agents and, for example, immunostimulatory molecules that could synergize direct tumor cell killing with reprogramming of the tumor immune microenvironment (TME). The translational and clinical pharmacology development strategy for ADCs is complicated by the need to understand the mechanism of action (MoA), the pharmacokinetics, and the pharmacodynamics of the different components of the ADC, and this gets even more complicated when two payloads are in play. The challenge lies, for instance, in understanding the MoA of each payload and the resulting synergy in effect, the increased number of analytes for bioanalysis, and the potential for added anti-drug antibody (ADA) formation due to more available epitopes in the ADC that could be recognized by the immune system. To date, no dual-payload ADCs have been approved, and this review is therefore intended to provide an overview on the translational science and clinical pharmacology strategies in the development of ADCs with two or more payloads based on what is currently known and published about single-payload ADCs and the authors' perspective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.