ArticleEuropean journal of oral sciences2026
Biological effects of a premixed calcium silicate pulp-capping material containing dimethyl sulphoxide as a vehicle: In vitro and in vivo study.
Article in European journal of oral sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the biological performance of a hydraulic calcium silicate cement (EndocemMTA Premixed) containing dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), developed to improve handling properties, in comparison with ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine. Human dental pulp cells were used for in vitro evaluation of cytocompatibility, cell migration and cell-material interactions. Odontogenic differentiation was assessed using a 3D culture model designed to simulate the clinical environment. Pulp capping was performed in vivo on rat maxillary molars, and reparative dentin formation and pulpal inflammatory responses were evaluated using micro-computed tomography (µCT) and histological analyses. In vitro, all investigated materials exhibited comparable cytocompatibility, cell migratory behaviour and odontogenic marker expression, with no significant differences among study groups. The µCT analysis demonstrated significantly greater reparative dentin formation in all experimental groups compared with the control, with Biodentine producing a higher dentin volume than EndocemMTA Premixed. Histological evaluation revealed no significant differences among the experimental groups with respect to pulpal inflammation or dentin bridge continuity. These findings suggest that the incorporation of DMSO into premixed formulations would not adversely affect cytocompatibility or pulp healing. Moreover, the 3D model used in this study might serve as a clinically relevant platform for evaluating pulp-material interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.