ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2026
Improving Follow-Up After Fall Risk Screening: A Quality Improvement Initiative in Primary Care After the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit.
Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFalls are a leading cause of preventable injury and disability among older adults. Although fall risk screening is routine in the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit (AWV), timely follow-up after a positive screen is often lacking. We implemented a primary care-based quality improvement initiative to increase the rate of fall risk prevention interventions provided to older adults at elevated fall risk.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of patients aged ≥ 65 years who completed an AWV between September 2024 and October 2025 and screened positive for fall risk using a three-item screener and confirmed with an abnormal Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. On January 1, 2025, we implemented a package of two quality improvement strategies to improve the uptake of evidence-based fall prevention interventions. First, we implemented a SmartSet in the Electronic Health Record which guides clinicians to select a clinically appropriate follow-up after a positive fall risk screen, and second, the geriatrics clinic proactively reached out to eligible patients to schedule comprehensive fall and bone health assessments. We evaluated follow-up rates over time. Outcomes measured 120 days post-screening during the AWV included: (1) the proportion of patients ≥ 65 with any documented follow-up action post-screening (physical therapy referral, case management visit, geriatrics referral, or geriatrics clinic visit), (2) any geriatrics referral, (3) any geriatrics visit, (4) any physical therapy referral, and (5) any case management referral.
resultsThree hundred thirty-five patients aged ≥ 65 years completed an AWV, screened as positive for fall risk, and had an abnormal TUG. Any follow-up increased from 53.8% to 67.8%. Follow-up geriatrics clinic visits increased from 7.5% to 40.4%. Primary care referral rates to geriatrics, physical therapy referrals and case management referrals remained stable.
conclusionA proactive package of implementation strategies embedded in primary care significantly improved follow-up rates after positive fall risk screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.