ArticleJournal of radiation research2026
Deep learning-based dose prediction in proton beam therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of network architectures and loss functions.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In proton beam therapy (PBT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), deep learning (DL)-based dose prediction offers clinical value by providing immediate reference dose distributions as a guideline tool for treatment planners and enabling virtual PBT dose assessment at institutions lacking PBT facilities to support clinical decision-making. This study proposes a dose gradient-aware DL training approach and a beam arrangement-free framework that predicts dose distributions from computed tomography (CT) images and target/organs-at-risk structures without requiring beam arrangement inputs. Using data from 172 HCC patients, we systematically compared 20 DL models combining five architectures with four loss functions, including a novel dose gradient-aware loss capturing PBT-specific dose distribution characteristics arising from the Bragg peak. Prediction accuracy was evaluated using dose metrics for clinical target volume, planning target volume, and normal liver, 10% dose region volume assessment, visual examination, Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for 10% dose region, and dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis. DL models employing dose gradient-aware loss demonstrated reduced prediction errors in target volume dose metrics, achieved the lowest errors in 10% dose region volume when combined with U-Net (MAE: 35.4 cm3, RMSE: 51.3 cm3), attained the highest DSC (0.88 ± 0.05), showed the closest DVH agreement with clinical plans for both target structures and normal liver. A comprehensive evaluation consistently confirmed the superiority of dose gradient-aware loss across all metrics, demonstrating the importance of physics-informed, dose gradient-aware learning for accurate PBT dose distribution prediction. Particularly, DL models combining simple architectures with dose gradient-aware loss predicted doses that closely approximated clinical doses in PBT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.