Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42089554›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2026

Deep learning-based dose prediction in proton beam therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of network architectures and loss functions.

Shuta Ogawa, Noriyuki Kadoya, Takahiro Kato, Ryohei Kato, Ryota Tozuka, Yuki Narita, Sho Oyama, Masao Murakami, Keiichi Jingu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shuta OgawaDepartment of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, 7-172 Yatsuyamada, Koriyama, Fukushima, 963-8052, Japan.ORCID 0009-0003-4909-4423
Noriyuki KadoyaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryou-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5018-3800
Takahiro KatoDepartment of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, 10-6 Sakaemachi, Fukushima, Fukushima, 960-8516, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8343-8037
Ryohei KatoDepartment of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, 7-172 Yatsuyamada, Koriyama, Fukushima, 963-8052, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0104-9696
Ryota TozukaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryou-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Yuki NaritaDepartment of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, 7-172 Yatsuyamada, Koriyama, Fukushima, 963-8052, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7594-6376
Sho OyamaDepartment of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, 7-172 Yatsuyamada, Koriyama, Fukushima, 963-8052, Japan.
Masao MurakamiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, 7-172 Yatsuyamada, Koriyama, Fukushima, 963-8052, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9530-0337
Keiichi JinguDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryou-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7032-1577

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 24K10873
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In proton beam therapy (PBT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), deep learning (DL)-based dose prediction offers clinical value by providing immediate reference dose distributions as a guideline tool for treatment planners and enabling virtual PBT dose assessment at institutions lacking PBT facilities to support clinical decision-making. This study proposes a dose gradient-aware DL training approach and a beam arrangement-free framework that predicts dose distributions from computed tomography (CT) images and target/organs-at-risk structures without requiring beam arrangement inputs. Using data from 172 HCC patients, we systematically compared 20 DL models combining five architectures with four loss functions, including a novel dose gradient-aware loss capturing PBT-specific dose distribution characteristics arising from the Bragg peak. Prediction accuracy was evaluated using dose metrics for clinical target volume, planning target volume, and normal liver, 10% dose region volume assessment, visual examination, Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for 10% dose region, and dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis. DL models employing dose gradient-aware loss demonstrated reduced prediction errors in target volume dose metrics, achieved the lowest errors in 10% dose region volume when combined with U-Net (MAE: 35.4 cm3, RMSE: 51.3 cm3), attained the highest DSC (0.88 ± 0.05), showed the closest DVH agreement with clinical plans for both target structures and normal liver. A comprehensive evaluation consistently confirmed the superiority of dose gradient-aware loss across all metrics, demonstrating the importance of physics-informed, dose gradient-aware learning for accurate PBT dose distribution prediction. Particularly, DL models combining simple architectures with dose gradient-aware loss predicted doses that closely approximated clinical doses in PBT.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularDeep LearningLiver NeoplasmsProton TherapyHumansRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray Computeddeep learningdose predictionhepatocellular carcinomaproton beam therapy

Identifiers

PMID42089554
PMCPMC13202326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.