ArticleJournal of food science2026
Three Successive Infusions: Scientific Insights Into a Traditional Green Tea Drinking Custom.
Article in Journal of food science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examines the scientific basis of a traditional multi-infusion tea-brewing practice common in Asia by evaluating compositional changes, antioxidant capacity, and sensory attributes across successive green tea infusions. Using UPLC-MS, GC-IMS, and elemental profiling, we characterized how repeated extractions alter key tea constituents. Although flavonoids, polyphenols, polysaccharides, and amino acids remained detectable across all infusions, the concentrations of major bioactive compounds including gallic acid, its esters, and L-theanine declined progressively from the first to the third infusion (GT1-GT3), corresponding with reduced in vivo radical-scavenging activity. Changes in volatile profiles and sensory evaluation further indicated noticeable shifts in flavor and taste with each infusion. Pearson correlation analysis revealed that most quantified compounds were positively associated with puckery, bitter, and acidic attributes, and negatively associated with sweetness and freshness. Variable Importance in Projection (VIP) analysis identified L-lysine, L-tyrosine, epicatechin, myricetin, theophylline, quercetin, and epigallocatechin as key contributors to sensory perception. These findings demonstrate that multiple infusions diversify flavor characteristics while modulating the bioactive profile of green tea, offering insights relevant to product development and consumer brewing practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.