ArticleStroke2026
Core Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion.
Article in Stroke, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMultimodal imaging has expanded treatment for patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion. Blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption measured in the ischemic core is associated with hemorrhagic transformation. However, the associations between core BBB disruption (cBBBD) and baseline clinical/imaging variables, as well as 3-month outcome, have not been explored.
methodsThis is a retrospective multicenter analysis of consecutive anterior circulation patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion, presenting over a 4-year time period, who were transferred from a primary to a comprehensive stroke center for possible endovascular therapy, with magnetic resonance imaging that included perfusion-weighted imaging before transfer. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were processed using RAPID software to generate penumbral imaging variables. Perfusion-weighted images were processed to detect and quantify contrast leakage; cBBBD was calculated as the average of all leaky voxels in the ischemic core. Poor functional outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of >2 at 3 months. Linear regression was used except for the outcome, which used logistic regression, controlling for age, stroke severity, and baseline functional status.
resultsOut of 411 patients transferred for endovascular therapy, 291 were included in this analysis with a median age of 74 years; 49% were female patients. The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 13, the mean core volume was 32.3 mL, and the mean cBBBD was 2.1%. 71% of patients underwent endovascular therapy. Admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (
conclusionsIn acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion, disruption of the BBB in the core lesion is independently associated with clinical outcome. cBBBD represents a new imaging profile for acute stroke that may help guide treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.