ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In-theater inhalation exposure to burn pit emissions (BPEs) and sand has been linked to respiratory issues, prompting a study to identify molecular alterations and potential biomarkers related to exposure and outcomes. Methods: Using a complex Results: Both BPE and BPE + Sand exposures significantly altered the lung microbiome, demonstrating increased mean alpha diversity and the highest number of unique ASVs. These changes in the lung microbiome began as early as 4 days post-exposure and continued throughout 90 days post-exposure. BPE and BPE + Sand groups had increased levels of Discussion: These data indicate that BPE exposure significantly alter the lung microbiome, whereas sand inhalation exposures alone did not seem to cause significant changes, nor did they provide an additive effect when combined with BPE. While the sub-chronic exposure study design led to more subtle molecular alterations in the lung tissue than expected, BPE exposures resulted in distinct and significant microbiome compositional changes in the lung. The observed population shift provided a signature specific to the type of inhalation exposure. Further efforts could lead to an understanding of the role of individual lung microbiomes in inhalation exposure risks and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.