ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Giant endometrial polyp in postmenopausal women without hormonal exposure: a case report and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Giant endometrial polyps (EPs) are rare in postmenopausal women without hormonal exposure. This study aimed to summarize their clinical presentation and management. Patient: Fifteen postmenopausal women with primary giant EPs were included: one case from our center and fourteen additional cases were retrieved from Pubmed, Web of science and Embase databases. Results: The fifteen patients ranged in age from 55 to 70 years, with polyp diameters ranging from 4.0 to 12.0 cm. The most common symptom was postmenopausal bleeding (PMB). Surgical intervention was performed in all cases: six patients underwent hysteroscopic polypectomy, eight received total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH-BSO) and one underwent dilation and curettage D&C. Most polyps (11/15) were benign on histology and exhibited cystic dilatation. Conclusion: Giant EPs in postmenopausal women are rare but predominantly benign, especially in the absence of hormonal exposure. Transvaginal sonography (TVS) is the first-line modality for initial evaluation. Diagnostic hysteroscopy with complete polypectomy remains the gold standard, enabling accurate histopathological assessment and avoiding unnecessary hysterectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.