Trial reportFrontiers in medicine2026
Safety and effectiveness of benralizumab in Indian patients with severe eosinophilic asthma: results from the FAST study.
Trial report in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05384938 (A Postmarketing, Phase 4, Multicentre, Prospective, Single-arm Study to Assess the Safety of Fasenra®), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Postmarketing, Phase 4, Multicentre, Prospective, Single-arm Study to Assess the Safety of Fasenra® (Benralizumab) in Adult Patients of Severe Asthma With Eosinophilic Phenotype in India.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: The phase IV Fasenra Safety Trial in India (FAST) assessed the safety and effectiveness of benralizumab for a period of 24 weeks in adult Indian patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. Methods: This phase IV, single-arm, multicenter, prospective, interventional study (NCT05384938) included benralizumab-naïve adult patients (18-75 years) with a physician-confirmed diagnosis of severe asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype. Patients received 30 mg of benralizumab subcutaneously once every 4 weeks for the first three doses and then 30 mg once every 8 weeks thereafter as part of routine clinical care. The primary outcomes included adverse events (AEs), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and serious TEAEs, along with the nature, incidence, and severity of AEs, including unexpected adverse drug reactions and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation or dose modifications. The secondary outcomes included time to first asthma exacerbation, annualized exacerbation rate, treatment outcome, and changes in absolute eosinophil count. Results: Of the 155 patients screened, 138 (89.0%) who received at least one dose of benralizumab were included in the safety and effectiveness analysis. At baseline, the median number of asthma exacerbation events per year was 2.0, and the median absolute eosinophil count was 375.0 cells/mm Conclusion: The findings of this prospective, single-arm, multicenter, phase IV study in Indian patients with severe eosinophilic asthma demonstrated that benralizumab showed an acceptable and expected safety profile with consistent efficacy. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05384938, identifier NCT05384938.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.