ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Development and validation of machine learning-based prediction for in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia and respiratory failure.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate prediction of in-hospital mortality for patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP) complicated by respiratory failure admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) remains a critical challenge. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model to predict this risk and compare its performance with conventional scoring systems. Methods: In this retrospective study, data from 164 patients with SCAP and respiratory failure admitted to the ICU between January 2017 and January 2024 were analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into a training set ( Results: The GBDT model demonstrated the best predictive performance, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.757-0.927) in the internal validation set, significantly outperforming the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II, AUC = 0.70). Calibration curves demonstrated good agreement between predicted and observed mortality risks, particularly across the mid-probability range. Decision curve analysis indicated that the model provided a higher net benefit than "treat-all" and "treat-none" strategies across a broad range of threshold probabilities. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis identified lactate, D-dimer, temperature, albumin, Prothrombin Time and Fraction of Inspired Oxygen as the six most influential predictors of in-hospital mortality. Based on these key predictors, we further developed a simplified nomogram to facilitate bedside risk estimation. Conclusion: The GBDT ML model, developed from routinely available clinical data, provides a highly accurate and clinically interpretable tool for predicting in-hospital mortality in SCAP patients with respiratory failure. It outperforms traditional severity scores and holds promise for assisting clinicians in risk stratification and early intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.