ArticleAWWA water science2025
Lithium Removal From Drinking Water.
Article in AWWA water science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Manifestations of Lithium Deficiency in the Human Body: What is Known to Date (A Narrative Review).Biological trace element research · 2026Review
- Lithium exposure in areas of the Western United States: Water and urinary levels in the Strong Heart Family Study.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lithium (Li) is listed on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's fifth Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 5), and its occurrence in drinking water is being quantified under the fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR5). Little information is available on its removal from drinking water. The current study evaluated 19 historical pilot- and full-scale studies and conducted sampling at 13 water treatment plants. The 32 sites included 3 surface water and 29 groundwater sources, and 8 treatment process categories. Conventional surface water treatment, adsorptive media, biological aerobic groundwater treatment, and manganese removal filters were not effective at removing Li. Cation exchange sometimes achieved Li removal, but removals were inconsistent. Lime softening often removed 11%-54% Li, but treated water Li typically was > 10 μg/L. RO removed > 90% of Li, although finished water concentrations depended on blending rates. This study fills a critical gap in evaluating Li treatability through the existing water treatment infrastructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.