ArticleContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2026
Best supportive care in patients with brain metastases: impact of the primary tumour type on survival.
Article in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The study was aimed to analyse the impact of the tumour type and other patient- and disease-related baseline parameters in a consecutive cohort managed with best supportive care (BSC) in northern Norway. Material and methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 149 patients managed with BSC without any systemic cancer-directed therapy or local brain-directed measures (2007-2024). Eleven patients were originally supposed to start active treatment and 12 had received prior prophylactic whole-brain irradiation (WBRT). Uni- and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for survival were performed. Results: Median survival after radiological diagnosis was 1.3 months (95% CI: 1.08-1.52) for all 149 patients combined. The 3- and 6-month survival rates were 20% and 1%, respectively. Neither prior WBRT nor upfront intention to treat were associated with survival. Steroid responders survived significantly longer than non-responders. The multivariate Cox model suggested that survival mainly depends on Karnofsky performance status (< 70 vs. ≥ 70), extracranial metastases (present/absent), and primary tumour type (better in renal cell cancer/malignant melanoma vs. all others combined), Conclusions: All prognostic strata in our study had median survival times < 2.5 months, indicating an inevitable poor outcome, despite presence of statistically significant differences, e.g. for the primary tumour type. The clinical impact of prognostic scores would thus be very limited. Median survival was similar in historical studies of BSC. Best supportive care is a reasonable choice in patients with brain metastases and very short life expectancy, as also evident from prospective research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.