ArticleFrontiers in insect science2026
Responses of cotton jassid (
Article in Frontiers in insect science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Breeding jassid-resistant okra (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cotton jassids ( Methods: Replicated field experiments were conducted at three locations within the Western and Eastern Cotton Growing Areas (WCGA and ECGA) of Tanzania during the 2024-2025 growing season. Four commonly recommended insecticides: Lambda-cyhalothrin, Chlorpyrifos, Imidacloprid, and Profenofos were evaluated alongside an untreated control using a randomised complete block design (RCBD). Applications were based on the economic threshold level (ETL = 1-2 jassids per plant) at 10 -14 day intervals. Mortality was assessed at 24, 48, and 72 hours post-application, and population reduction was calculated using Abbott's formula. Data were analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), with means separated using Duncan's Multiple Range Test (DMRT) at 95% confidence. Results: All tested insecticides significantly reduced both nymph and adult jassid populations compared to the control, although their efficacy varied. Imidacloprid was the most effective, achieving mean reductions of 67.59% (nymphs) and 66.31% (adults), followed by profenofos with reductions of 52.75% (nymphs) and 55.83% (adults). Discussion: The results demonstrate that insecticide effectiveness varies considerably, with Imidacloprid showing superior performance under field conditions. These findings suggest that its inclusion in integrated pest management (IPM) programmes could improve jassid control. However, optimisation of application practices remains essential to enhance overall efficacy and sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.