ReviewHealth science reports2026
Large Language Models for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Chronic Liver Diseases: A Systematic Review.
Review in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Chronic liver disease (CLD) affects more than 800 million people worldwide and remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning, has been applied to hepatology for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. Large language models (LLMs) represent a new generation of AI with unique capabilities for processing unstructured clinical text, integrating multimodal inputs, and facilitating patient communication. Their role in CLD, however, has not been systematically reviewed. Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD420250650268). A literature search of five databases was performed using predefined keywords related to LLMs and CLD. Eligible studies included articles reporting diagnostic, prognostic, clinical decision support, or patient education applications of LLMs in CLD. Results: A total of 18 studies published between 2023 and 2025 met the inclusion criteria. Studies spanned multiple regions, including the USA, Europe, China, South Asia, and Australia, and employed diverse designs. Evaluated models included ChatGPT-3.5/4, GPT-4o, Bard, Gemini, vision-enabled GPT, and retrieval-augmented frameworks. Applications clustered into four thematic domains: (1) diagnostics, including HCC detection from CT/MRI, CEUS LI-RADS classification, fibrosis staging from pathology text and histology, and MASLD identification from clinical/lab data; (2) prognosis, including cirrhosis phenotyping and fibrosis progression; (3) clinical decision support, with RAG-based systems improving HCV guideline interpretation and agent-based approaches generating guideline-concordant prescriptions; and (4) patient education, where LLMs achieved 70%-90% accuracy in HBV, MASLD, cirrhosis, and AIH queries, though readability and complexity limited patient-facing utility. Conclusions: LLMs show promising applications across the CLD spectrum, from diagnostics and prognostics to decision support and patient engagement. Current evidence is preliminary, largely retrospective, and heterogeneous. Rigorous prospective studies and careful integration strategies are required to ensure safe, effective, and equitable deployment in hepatology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.