ArticleHealth science reports2026
Which Exercise Protocol Is Optimal for Improving Lower Crossed Syndrome in Athletes? Core Stability or NASM.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Lower crossed syndrome (LCS) is a common postural dysfunction among individuals with sedentary lifestyles; however, it can also affect athletes due to sport-specific demands. This study aimed to investigate and compare the effects of core stability exercises (CSE) and National Academy of Sports Medicine (NASM) exercises on lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, and trunk muscle endurance in athletes with LCS. Methods: This study employed an experimental design with pretest and posttest assessments across three groups. Thirty-six male athletes with LCS (aged 20-30 years) were randomly assigned to three groups: the CSE group, the NASM group, and the control group. Participants in the experimental groups performed their respective exercise protocols for 8 weeks (3 sessions per week). Lumbar lordosis and pelvic tilt angles were assessed using a flexicurve and a pelvic inclinometer, respectively. Additionally, the McGill test was used to determine the endurance of the trunk muscles. Results: Both exercise protocols significantly decreased the lumbar lordosis angle and pelvic tilt, and significantly increased the endurance of the trunk flexors and extensors ( Conclusions: An 8-week of core stability and NASM exercise program are recommended to reduce the lumbar lordosis angle and pelvic tilt and to improve the endurance of trunk flexors and extensors in athletes with LCS. Although only the NASM protocol increased the endurance of lateral trunk flexors on both the dominant and nondominant sides, no significant difference was observed between the two exercise protocols regarding the other variables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.