ArticlePreventive medicine reports2026
Health claims about cannabidiol (CBD) at the point-of-sale in three U.S. states with disparate cannabis policies.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: We assessed point-of-sale advertising for CBD in three states with different cannabis laws (i.e., medical/recreational use; medical only; CBD/low THC) to determine if CBD is marketed in ways that are prohibited by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Under FDA authority, CBD cannot be marketed with misleading advertising, as an unapproved drug, dietary supplement, food product, or FDA-approved/endorsed product. Methods: Between November 2021 and April 2022, two trained data collectors systematically documented point-of-sale advertising in 150 retailers using wearable imaging in Colorado, Maryland, and North Carolina. Advertising was content analyzed to determine the types of cannabinoids, prohibited health claims, and medical conditions it claimed to affect. Results: We documented and content analyzed 1090 CBD-specific advertisements, resulting in 985 prohibited claims, representing all claim types. Among CBD-specific ads, over half (61.8%) contained at least one prohibited claim. CBD was frequently advertised as an unapproved drug (53.6%) and food additive (51.6%). Prohibited therapeutic claims were made for 125 different health conditions, including pain, inflammation, and cancer. Most retailers (80%) displayed at least one prohibited claim. Conclusions: Prohibited advertising for CBD, which may mislead consumers about its risks and benefits, is extensive at the point-of-sale, highlighting the need for enforcement efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.