Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42088991›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2026

Health claims about cannabidiol (CBD) at the point-of-sale in three U.S. states with disparate cannabis policies.

Kimberly G Wagoner, Olivia E Horton, Cynthia K Suerken, E Alfonso Romero-Sandoval, Allison J Lazard, Kerry Cork, Renee Parker, Beth A Reboussin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kimberly G WagonerDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Olivia E HortonDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Cynthia K SuerkenDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
E Alfonso Romero-SandovalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Allison J LazardHussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Kerry CorkPublic Health Law Center, Mitchell Hamline School of Law, Saint Paul, MN 55104, USA.
Renee ParkerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Beth A ReboussinDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.

Funding

The Impact of Cannabidiol (CBD) Health Claims at Point-of-Sale on Consumer Perceptions and BehaviorR01DA051542 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Kimberly G. Wagoner · 2021 to 2026
$2.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA051542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: We assessed point-of-sale advertising for CBD in three states with different cannabis laws (i.e., medical/recreational use; medical only; CBD/low THC) to determine if CBD is marketed in ways that are prohibited by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Under FDA authority, CBD cannot be marketed with misleading advertising, as an unapproved drug, dietary supplement, food product, or FDA-approved/endorsed product. Methods: Between November 2021 and April 2022, two trained data collectors systematically documented point-of-sale advertising in 150 retailers using wearable imaging in Colorado, Maryland, and North Carolina. Advertising was content analyzed to determine the types of cannabinoids, prohibited health claims, and medical conditions it claimed to affect. Results: We documented and content analyzed 1090 CBD-specific advertisements, resulting in 985 prohibited claims, representing all claim types. Among CBD-specific ads, over half (61.8%) contained at least one prohibited claim. CBD was frequently advertised as an unapproved drug (53.6%) and food additive (51.6%). Prohibited therapeutic claims were made for 125 different health conditions, including pain, inflammation, and cancer. Most retailers (80%) displayed at least one prohibited claim. Conclusions: Prohibited advertising for CBD, which may mislead consumers about its risks and benefits, is extensive at the point-of-sale, highlighting the need for enforcement efforts.

Indexed as

CannabidiolcannabisHealth claimsMarketingPoint-of-sale

Identifiers

PMID42088991
PMCPMC13136640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.