ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2026
Increased frequency of remote and off-site work impacts incident learning workflows in radiation oncology.
Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Incident learning is key to improving clinical quality and safety. This study evaluates the impact of workflow changes related to increasing remote work on incident learning in a radiation oncology clinic. Methods and materials: We analyzed reported event data for three 12-month intervals: Results: Over the three years considered, 798 event reports were submitted and reviewed. The reporting rate (number of reported events per patient simulated) decreased over time: pre-COVID 0.18 [335/1834]; during-COVID 0.15 [245/1609]; and COVID-adapted 0.13 [218/1695]. The severity of events declined over time (p=<0.001). As time progressed, the location of event origin shifted towards earlier steps in our workflows (i.e. towards simulation-related imaging and treatment planning). Similarly, the point of event discovery shifted to earlier steps as well (ie. towards during pretreatment review and verification, and away from treatment delivery and management). Communication was frequently identified as a contributor during the latter two time periods while workload was less frequently cited compared to pre-COVID. Conclusion: The severity, site of origin/discovery of events and associated/contributing factors varied over time demonstrating shifts in the nature of events associated with changes in pandemic-induced workflows. Additional efforts to promote event reporting are needed to maintain the benefits of incident learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.