ArticleJournal of cleaner production2025
Designing cost-effective supply chains for plastics at the end-of-life.
Article in Journal of cleaner production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Increased global plastic consumption and production boosted the amount of end-of-life (EoL) plastic. Also, 90 % of plastic EoL is either landfilled or incinerated. These unsustainable EoL pathways impact the environment and human health and waste valuable materials. Thus, improvements to the existing recycling infrastructure for sustainable plastic management are needed to enhance plastic circularity. Therefore, this contribution addresses optimizing cost-effective pathways for plastic recycling within the supply chain. The research uses mathematical optimization and the P-graph theoretical framework to calculate recycling costs, encompassing both capital expenditure and operational expenditure for various pathways of plastic recycling. The proposed methodology is applied through a detailed case study in Miskolc, Hungary, revealing estimated recycling costs ranging from 54.9 to 59.28 EUR/ton. This finding provides crucial insights into the economic implications of diverse recycling methods. Also, the study highlights the P-graph model's untapped potential as a resource for decision-makers in plastic recycling, particularly the enumeration of options for further consideration. The work's utility and novelty lie in the model's capability to design cost-effective pathways, offering a tangible contribution to the plastic recycling supply chain. Finally, this contribution offers economic solutions needed to ensure cost-effective sustainable plastic management solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.