ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
A standardized rat model of maxillary anterior periodontal soft tissue defect for the evaluation of soft tissue graft materials.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Functional reconstruction of periodontal soft tissue is a major focus in both clinical and basic research within the field of dentistry. However, standardized small-animal models that accurately recapitulate clinical periodontal soft tissue defect remain limited, hindering the development of the graft materials. This study aimed to establish a standardized, minimally invasive and reproducible rat model of periodontal soft tissue defect for systematic Methods: The anatomical characteristics of the maxillary and mandibular anterior labial regions and the hard palate in rats were comprehensively assessed to identify optimal recipient and donor sites. Based on these findings, a standardized 4 × 2 mm soft tissue defect was created in the maxillary anterior labial region and reconstructed using autograft, xenograft or left untreated as a control. The healing process was evaluated through sequential clinical observation, H&E staining, Masson's trichrome staining and immunohistochemical analyses. Results: The results demonstrated that this model enabled consistent defect creation with low complication rates and high reproducibility. Distinct yet clinically relevant healing patterns were observed among different treatment groups, closely resembling those reported in human periodontal soft tissue reconstruction. The model allowed dynamic evaluation of the quality of healing, tissue integration, materials degradation, angiogenesis and immune response of periodontal soft tissue regeneration. Discussion: This model provides a robust and translationally relevant
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.